It’s clear the Internet is changing our world as we know it and we’re starting to see a significant shift in the balance of influence. American politics is slowly starting to wake up to this reality and only time will tell where we go from here.

But being submersed in the drama of American politics makes it really easy to forget about what’s going on elsewhere. This month’s issue of Wired changes that with a story on what social media’s doing to slowly crack the tightly controlled structure of authority in Egypt & the Middle East:

Back in March, Maher and a friend launched a Facebook group to promote a protest planned for April 6. It became an Internet phenomenon, quickly attracting more than 70,000 members. The April 6 youth movement — amorphous, lacking a clear mission*, and yet a bull’s-eye to the zeitgeist — blossomed within days into something influential enough to arouse the ire of Egypt’s internal security forces. Maher is part of a new generation in the Middle East that, through blogs, YouTube, Flickr, Twitter, and now Facebook, is using virtual reality to combat corrupt and oppressive governments. Their nascent, tech-fired rebellion has triggered a government backlash and captured the world’s attention.

The article also ends with an interesting line of thought:

But Maher isn’t tortured. No one can say why his treatment in custody is more lenient this time around. One possibility is that, lacking specific orders to beat or harm him, his captors in Alexandria just went easy.

There is another hypothesis, though, one that many people familiar with Egyptian politics have suggested: Maher’s star has risen. His real-world profile is now high enough that torturing him could backfire, inspiring countless networked young people to take action. The last thing Hosni Mubarak needs is to turn this Facebooking regular guy into a full-fledged hero.

In a seemingly unrelated event, my favorite news website online, Socialmedian, is releasing an election widget with the Washington Post today:

The http://election.socialmedian.com site aggregates news and user-feeds related to the election and enables users to join in the election coverage and discussion.  We created this site with The Washington Post to enable people to track all the election news from thousands of news sources as well as from Twitter feeds, Flickr photos, YouTube videos, and more all in one place, and (importantly) to join-in and add their own feeds from their favorite sites to provide user reports leading up to and on election day.

You can see what looks like to the right and although It’s not election day just yet, it’s never a bad thing to get a feel for what’s underfoot going into the election, so play with it (click “Join In” on the widget if you’re not a member) and let the games begin! (follow me at follow bushmanbill when you sign up).

*If the whole thing sounds “amorphous” & “lacking a clear mission” to you too, read Seth Godin’s latest book (aptly named Tribes), which is all about movements, what their made of, the things that happen to make tribes possible to begin with and how to keep them going. In what amounts to one long essay that goes by all too quickly, Godin explains the situation and then presents the opportunity:

A tribe is any group of people, large or small, who are connected to one another, a leader, and an idea. For millions of years, humans have been seeking out tribes, be they religious, ethnic, economic, political, or even musical (think of the Deadheads). It’s our nature.

Now the Internet has eliminated the barriers of geography, cost, and time. All those blogs and social networking sites are helping existing tribes get bigger. But more important, they’re enabling countless new tribes to be born—groups of ten or ten thousand or ten million who care about their iPhones, or a political campaign, or a new way to fight global warming.

And so the key question: Who is going to lead us?

His article on the over-hyped Internet is also a good read.

We stand at a time in history unlike any other. Technological advances have made the spread of information nearly instantaneous. Pictures, words, audio and video fly around the globe on a network made of wires and radio waves.

A little known Republican presidential candidate with views radically different from the established elite took up to twenty percent of primary votes in some states. He broke fundraising records and built an unparalleled grass roots network using only the internet.

The ongoing war in Iraq provides another example of the ways our world has changed. Soldiers writing blogs on their experience in Iraq, tech savvy investigators revealing gross financial mishandling. Traditional media has proven either incapable of, or unwilling to, report material which could damage interests currently protecting their monopolies. Average people with internet connections have stepped up where news networks haven’t.

A major commercial band decided to release an album online, and allowed their listeners to pay whatever price they felt was justified. They distributed hundreds of thousands of copies of their work and made more money than they could have using traditional methods of distribution.

People download millions of songs, videos, pictures, and books every day utilizing decentralized peer to peer networks. Bittorrent, Gnutella, Usenet, and Freenet, all allow individuals to freely share any information which can be copied.

We live in a world where information is no longer expensive to distribute. More importantly, information is nearly impossible to control.

Networked computing has changed the world in a way that is many orders of magnitude greater than the printing press.

The fear this creates in the ruling elite is apparent. Corporations are no longer able to control the distribution of media. Media corporations face a future in which they cannot profit simply from control of physical distribution networks; Networks they gained control of through coercive means.

Information is, in a very real way, power. Every decision we make is influenced by the information available to us. Controlling people is not difficult if you’re able to control the information available to them.

The debate about net neutrality taking place right now is primarily concerned with service providers slowing down or blocking certain types of traffic. Allowing this to take place would practically ensure the end of the internet as a free marketplace.

Imposing restrictions on the web is not only beneficial to media conglomerates such as AOL-Time Warner, it’s also beneficial to those in political control.

The only way to reduce corruption in government is to hold ‘public servants’ responsible for their actions. The established media has shown itself to be entirely uninterested in keeping government accountable, preferring to buy favorable market conditions for themselves.

I normally am opposed to government regulation. However, if net neutrality legislation prolongs this age of free information, then I think it may be a good thing.

Whatever grace period can be bought, you can be assured that politicians and corporate interests will not be satisfied till they control our access to information. We must use every opportunity available to increase transparency in government, and to accelerate development of technology that will allow circumvention of controls imposed on the free exchange of information. The freedom enjoyed by many of us could be in jeopardy if we don’t.